Thursday, August 22, 2013

Paul's Review of The Catcher in the Rye

The Catcher in the Rye
J.D. Salinger

Holden Caulfield kills me. He really does. He's a goddamn mess, that's what he is. I hate him. You know what really annoys me? When you read a book as a kid and then read it again a hundred years later and the crumby thing holds up.

I read The Catcher in the Rye as a teenager in the early 1960s. I never bothered to check the publication date; for 50 years I believed it came out just about the time I first read it. I was wrong: Salinger wrote it just after WWII; it was published in 1951. It had been an instant best-seller and was already an established classic by the time my rebellious schoolmates and I read it.

My primary reason for re-reading Catcher in the Rye was to learn why it's such a controversial book, why it so infuriates the book-banning crowd. I didn't expect to enjoy the experience: I assumed I'd outgrown the book in the same way I outgrew Kerouac's On the Road, which I thought life-changing as a 14-year-old but squirm-inducingly embarrassing as a senior citizen.

As it turned out, I loved reading Catcher again. Though I no longer share Holden Caulfield's teenaged angst and alienation, I still feel for him. He doesn't come across as some historical artifact, but as a flesh and blood kid, vivid and fresh, totally believable. Which, I guess, validates what I earlier said about assuming the book had just come out in the early 1960s when I initially read it. Even though Holden's story takes place in the 1940s, a reader in the 1960s could be convinced Holden was a contemporary, and even today, in 2013, Holden feels part of the here and now.

I remember being struck by Holden's swearing when I read the book as a kid. My classmates and I used the same language (and worse), but seeing it in print was shocking ... and liberating. Curiously, I remembered Holden saying "fuck" on almost every page, but that turned out to be another false memory. He doesn't use the word until the very end, and then only to deplore the fact that some unknown vandal has carved "fuck you" into the wall of a stairwell at his little sister's school. What Holden does say, and say often, is "goddamn," "bastard," "bitch," and "hell." That's mild language by today's standards, but it doesn't date the novel ... you feel like you're listening to a troubled but essentially polite and well-bred young man, someone who'd open up in a private conversation with a friend but never cuss in front of strangers. The language doesn't come across as quaint or outdated, and that's another reason the novel holds up.

As with the swearing, I remembered Holden talking about sex more than he actually does. He thinks about girls all the time but he's a virgin, and the one opportunity he has to get it on with a room-service prostitute, he's too shy to do anything and pays her to put her clothes back on and leave. He worries that the girls he knows will succumb to his older, more experienced, classmates' advances. He's aware of the existence of homosexuals and disdains them. That's as explicit as Holden ever gets about sex; what little he does say about the subject is abstract and non-pornographic.

So why does Catcher in the Rye push so many blue-nose buttons? It's hard to believe, but as recently as 2005 Catcher could still make the American Library Association's top ten list of challenged and banned books. When parents demand school administrators pull the book from library shelves and English class reading lists today, they cite Holden's language and vague talk about sex. They also cite his smoking and drinking, his lack of religious faith, his poor study habits, his overall negativity. They don't think he's a good model for their kids. I suspect that somewhere in there is some rural resentment of snobby upper-class New York City folks. That pretty much sums it up: they don't like Holden Caulfield and therefore they don't want anyone reading what he has to say. Maybe they're afraid their kids will feel as validated and liberated as I did when I met Holden in 1962.

You know what, though? Even though it's one of the most challenged, banned, and censored books ever taught in American high schools, it's also a best-seller and one of the most-taught books in American high schools, a beloved book to millions, a classic.

Holden Caulfield's still out there somewhere. I hope he didn't grow up to be just another goddamn phony. That would kill me, it really would.

Wednesday, February 27, 2013

The Things They Carried

The Things They Carried by Tim O'Brien is a compilation of short stories revolving around a platoon of soldiers during the Vietnam war. These short stories revolve around life before, after, and during the war; what these men carried, physically, mentally, emotionally, and invisibly.

This book was challenged and banned due to moments of profanity, which surprised me, because of how graphic parts of this book are. I am completely against censorship, but the reasoning to ban this novel seemed weird considering the other subject matter. I am not new to war stories or materials, but parts of this book did make me cringe. The raw truth that can only come from a soldier's mouth can sometimes be hard to take in. Being an avid lover of M*A*S*H and being the daughter of a history buff, I have had many a conversation and lesson of the personal experience of war, and every adaptation and different storyteller manages to teach something new. O'Brien did not fall short.

I loved these stories, I didn't always love the characters, but I think that O'Brien did a great job in bringing in his own voice and own renditions of the war to help the reader understand a little better what war is all about. This book reminds you that you can never understand, because even those in the trenches cannot fully understand it either.

I fully intend to read Tim O'Brien's other works, I appreciate his raw sincerity and ability to convey meaning in places that are usually foggy. I would recommend this book to anyone and everyone, especially those who are trying to understand society as a whole, or who are struggling with dealing with realities of life.

Friday, November 2, 2012

Would you call this censorship?

A Canadian publisher has taken away Santa's pipe and thus the smoke curling around his head in a new version of an old favorite.  Twas the Night Before Christmas, illustrated by Elena Almazova and Vitaly Shvarov, was published in September and has already caused quite a ruckus.
"The stump of a pipe he held tight in his teeth,
And the smoke it encircled his head like a wreath."
While some complain that taking out a line that Clement Moore wrote a hundred years ago is censorship, the author wanted to help Santa kick his smoking habit.
"I'm not telling people not to read books, and anyone is free to go out and buy one of the many other editions of this book. But smoking is going to kill one billion people in this century, and that needs to be discussed."
On the other hand, the publisher easily found this in a child's email letter to Santa:
"I also want my Mom and Step Dad to stop smoking.  Pretty Please."
What do you think?  Read the article (or any of the many others online just google "Santa smoking" to find them), and let's talk about this change in a classic book.  Is it censorship, or is it a good idea?

Monday, October 1, 2012

Censorship

On this second day of Banned Books Week, Jan @ Yearning for God wrote about censorship, refuting this quote by George Bernard Shaw:

Censorship
will Rage
until it reduces itself to
Absurdity;
and even then
the best books will be
in Danger still.

Jan took part in a Read-Out on Saturday.  She read from Shel Silverstein's challenged book, A Light in the Attic, and shared one of his whimsical illustrated poems on her blog.

Sunday, September 30, 2012

The Bane of Banned Books



Bill Moyers, honorary co-chair of Banned Books Week, talks about how libraries provided his first opportunity to indulge his love of reading and learning.  He shares his dismay over efforts to remove books from schools and libraries in modern times in this video essay entitled, "The Bane of Banned Books."  (If the video quits working, click on the link to view it on YouTube.)

Saturday, September 29, 2012

Banned Books Week ~ starts tomorrow!



"Many people are amazed to learn that books are still banned and challenged in libraries and schools across the United States of America.  Join us in spreading awareness about censorship by participating in the American Library Association's Banned Books Week 2012.  Banned Books Week runs September 30th through October 6th."

 This thought that flashed across the screen (at 0:44) is oh-so-true!

People ban books because
they can't ban thoughts.

If the video quits working, see it on YouTube here:  50 State Salute to Banned Books: Massachusetts Library Association.  Many thanks to A.M. for sharing this link.

Wednesday, September 26, 2012

Calling all bloggers!

Sheila @ Book Journey is "looking for bloggers to participate in Banned Books Week by choosing to read one or more of the Banned Books on the list or to write a post about banned books week.  All participants will go into a drawing for a $20 Amazon gift card as my thank you for participating in a week that is near and dear to me."

Here are the books Sheila has reviewed (so far) on this Banned Books blog: